In at least three places, this article states that "Archer" is the perpetrator, which is not true. Michael Rohana is the perpetrator; Jacob Archer is an FBI agent who prepared the affidavit.
You have made a mistake in your explanation here:
"When a woman who is Rh-Negative is pregnant with a child that is Rh-Positive, the blood from the mother is essentially toxic to the child."
This is wrong, The RH positive child is the danger to the RH negative mother - the RH negative mother will mae antibodies against the RH positive child *IF* the RH Positive bloods get into the RH Negative mothers system (say via a bleed, miscarriage etc) I am an 'RH Negative A 'mother with 2 'RH positive O' sons and know very well the issues that happen.
For 11 generations my father's line were blacksmiths and edged tool makers. When working with a raw piece of iron, heating it and hammering it into an initial shape, they would call this drawing out the iron. The word drawing can also be used for pulling something out. In this article it mentions the earliest image was a sword in an anvil. The importance of smithing skills would be vital to a warrior society of that time. Indeed, the Assyrians would execute anyone who would teach the technology to outsiders. Is it possible that Arthur was a smith who could draw a sword out of iron ore (upon an anvil) as well as a military leader?
I can't imagine walking down to the bottom, filling up a jar, and carrying it all the way back to the surface.
People in those days had to be a lot tougher.
So much of the Jewish Old Testament is copied from earlier texts- namely from the Sumerian texts, where you will find fuller versions of the Creation, the Flood, the Garden of Eden etc.
The Jews even copied texts from the Ancient Egyptians and pretended that it was their own work.
Why are peopoe so fixated on these Jewish copies, whilst ignoring the erlier texts- which will, in turn, be found to be mere copies of an even earlier civilisation?
Even though People of Earth are intelligent beings ! They are Prone to making the same mistakes over and over again ! The Same Type of Leaders whom only Lead For Themselves ! The only People whom Reap The Rewards of Leadership , are the Leaders and They`er Cronies ! King Queens and Presidents are nothing more than People ! But the average Person gives to much POWER to the Leaders , so that they Feel Like Gods ! Its up to Humanity to Change the Way That They Are Lead ! Or it is Doomed to REPEAT !
There is likely more than one 'lost continent" especially if the Bering Land bridge theory is correct. If the waters were low enough for that land to have been exposes, the Mid-Atlantic mountain range would have been exposed (Atlantis). Lemuria would have been exposed. the Polynesian Islands would have been Mountain tops on a larger Continent (as their native legends claim). Japan would have been connected to China as their legends claim.
lack of science and lefts over charlatanism in this supposed "research ''.
Nowadays, there are plenty of authors who fake data to sell esoteric fiction.
The Paracas skulls case is another example.
Every person is lactose intolerant it is just a matter of the degree of intolerance. We do not become lactose tolerant. Milk and especially the milk of an entirely different species is not and I repeat, not digestible by a human adult. We do not have the enzyme to coagulate and slowly digest milk after being weaned from our human mothers. Many (most) babies suffer because of cows milk.
Human adaptation is provable. Evolution has not yet been proved. The two subjects should be distinguished. “very likely to have dark brown skin and blue eyes” very likely is not fact or proof. In fact it is most probably not the case. The image of the dark man is a reconstruction by Kennis and Kennis is not a fact but an artistic rendition. I do sometimes feel that we are being educated to take this in as reality, the fiction of our ancestors and I also feel for a malevolent purpose.
I find it very convenient that none of the claims made by so called discoverers of various articles; the Ark of the Covenant, Noah’s Ark, etc., can produce definitive proof. I have no problem with people’s belief in various religious texts, but please if you are going to make these types of claims provide some sort of proof. I believe in evolution because proof of various adaptations allowing survival of the fitist exists. Until there is definitive proof the Bible (written a hundred years after the death of Christ) is merely the story of a man who started a movement and belief system which has persisted for many years.
I thinks its possible “ The Beast of Exmoor” could be an escaped zoo animal or even an exotic pet that somone let go. I’m a fan of cryptozoology so I take an interest in arcticles such as this.
I agree with Tsurugi! If the evidence is plausible then the possibility that these “ Negev Desert dwellers” were in fact the ancient Israelites shouldn’t be ignored by archeologists.
Here you can navigate quickly through all comments made in any article sorted by date/time.
In at least three places, this article states that "Archer" is the perpetrator, which is not true. Michael Rohana is the perpetrator; Jacob Archer is an FBI agent who prepared the affidavit.
You have made a mistake in your explanation here:
"When a woman who is Rh-Negative is pregnant with a child that is Rh-Positive, the blood from the mother is essentially toxic to the child."
This is wrong, The RH positive child is the danger to the RH negative mother - the RH negative mother will mae antibodies against the RH positive child *IF* the RH Positive bloods get into the RH Negative mothers system (say via a bleed, miscarriage etc) I am an 'RH Negative A 'mother with 2 'RH positive O' sons and know very well the issues that happen.
For 11 generations my father's line were blacksmiths and edged tool makers. When working with a raw piece of iron, heating it and hammering it into an initial shape, they would call this drawing out the iron. The word drawing can also be used for pulling something out. In this article it mentions the earliest image was a sword in an anvil. The importance of smithing skills would be vital to a warrior society of that time. Indeed, the Assyrians would execute anyone who would teach the technology to outsiders. Is it possible that Arthur was a smith who could draw a sword out of iron ore (upon an anvil) as well as a military leader?
I don’t think I’ve ever heard of the Maero before so I found this to be a very enjoyable read.
I spent a week in Malaga in the spring of 2001, and didn't know about this.
Wish I had.
I can't imagine walking down to the bottom, filling up a jar, and carrying it all the way back to the surface.
People in those days had to be a lot tougher.
So much of the Jewish Old Testament is copied from earlier texts- namely from the Sumerian texts, where you will find fuller versions of the Creation, the Flood, the Garden of Eden etc.
The Jews even copied texts from the Ancient Egyptians and pretended that it was their own work.
Why are peopoe so fixated on these Jewish copies, whilst ignoring the erlier texts- which will, in turn, be found to be mere copies of an even earlier civilisation?
Even though People of Earth are intelligent beings ! They are Prone to making the same mistakes over and over again ! The Same Type of Leaders whom only Lead For Themselves ! The only People whom Reap The Rewards of Leadership , are the Leaders and They`er Cronies ! King Queens and Presidents are nothing more than People ! But the average Person gives to much POWER to the Leaders , so that they Feel Like Gods ! Its up to Humanity to Change the Way That They Are Lead ! Or it is Doomed to REPEAT !
There is likely more than one 'lost continent" especially if the Bering Land bridge theory is correct. If the waters were low enough for that land to have been exposes, the Mid-Atlantic mountain range would have been exposed (Atlantis). Lemuria would have been exposed. the Polynesian Islands would have been Mountain tops on a larger Continent (as their native legends claim). Japan would have been connected to China as their legends claim.
Return with your SHEILD or on it.
... and puns, this is why the 'serpent' was really Sarpanit.
OMG, my former teacher's name is Phryne. If only she knew it meant frog and was used by a prostitute.
Yes because white skin, blond and red hair only arrived in Europe along with the arrival of Indo-European speakers.
lack of science and lefts over charlatanism in this supposed "research ''.
Nowadays, there are plenty of authors who fake data to sell esoteric fiction.
The Paracas skulls case is another example.
Dr Pinkola Estés describes Baba Yaga as the cycle life-death-life.
Much of this article is speculative at best.
Every person is lactose intolerant it is just a matter of the degree of intolerance. We do not become lactose tolerant. Milk and especially the milk of an entirely different species is not and I repeat, not digestible by a human adult. We do not have the enzyme to coagulate and slowly digest milk after being weaned from our human mothers. Many (most) babies suffer because of cows milk.
Human adaptation is provable. Evolution has not yet been proved. The two subjects should be distinguished. “very likely to have dark brown skin and blue eyes” very likely is not fact or proof. In fact it is most probably not the case. The image of the dark man is a reconstruction by Kennis and Kennis is not a fact but an artistic rendition. I do sometimes feel that we are being educated to take this in as reality, the fiction of our ancestors and I also feel for a malevolent purpose.
representations of ;handbags; are in Aboriginal rock art, much earlier than Gobekli Tepe
I find it very convenient that none of the claims made by so called discoverers of various articles; the Ark of the Covenant, Noah’s Ark, etc., can produce definitive proof. I have no problem with people’s belief in various religious texts, but please if you are going to make these types of claims provide some sort of proof. I believe in evolution because proof of various adaptations allowing survival of the fitist exists. Until there is definitive proof the Bible (written a hundred years after the death of Christ) is merely the story of a man who started a movement and belief system which has persisted for many years.
I thinks its possible “ The Beast of Exmoor” could be an escaped zoo animal or even an exotic pet that somone let go. I’m a fan of cryptozoology so I take an interest in arcticles such as this.
I agree with Tsurugi! If the evidence is plausible then the possibility that these “ Negev Desert dwellers” were in fact the ancient Israelites shouldn’t be ignored by archeologists.
Pages